srch

This site has fuel consumption data by Aircraft type and claims the 789 typically burns 5400kg/h. Is this number accurate?

According to data from launch customer All Nippon Airways, the 787 surpassed the promised 20% fuel burn reduction compared to that of the Boeing 767. This newer ...

17.06.2020 · As we see, an Airbus A380 burns twice as much fuel per hour as a Boeing 787-9. A head-to-head comparison between the two aircraft can give airlines millions of dollars in savings just by choosing a 787-9 over the A380 (though an A380 has almost double the number of seats compared to the 787).

The aircraft's wing design and construction enable speed and fuel efficiency. The 787 is also the first commercial widebody aircraft with a fuselage made of ...

performance and fuel burn analysis is provided by Lufthansa Systems, and our conclusions are our own. Aircraft types & variants All production versions of the two main types in our evaluation were included, meaning Boeing’s 787-8, 787-9 and 787-10; and Airbus’s A350-900, and A350-1000. The Airbus A350-900ULR is not included, because this ...

In addition to the improved fuel burn requirements, the 787 propulsion system also had to meet more stringent noise and emissions requirements. Finally, in order to maximize the capital value of the airplane, Boeing decided that the propulsion systems should be designed for full interchangeability between the two engine types.

Answer (1 of 2): Tom’s answer is excellent and very accurate. The following table is approximations only. * Boeing 757-200 — 3320 kg/h * Boeing 757-300 — 3900 kg/h * Boeing 767–200ER — 4500 kg/h * Boeing 767-300 — 4800 kg/h * Boeing 767-300ER — 4940 kg/h * Boeing 767-400ER — 5200 kg/h * B...

16.09.2018 · Post for 787 Pilots. What is the Typical Real World Fuel Burn for a 789? #20714861. This site has fuel consumption data by Aircraft type and claims the 789 typically burns 5400kg/h. Is this number accurate? I've seen a few posts indicating this number is high, claiming 4800kg/h TATL eastbound.

Average fuel burn of new commercial jet aircraft, 1960 to 2019..... 9 Figure 4. Trend in ... family, the compound annual reduction rate increases to 1.3% per year. ... A320neo, Boeing 737 MAX, Airbus A350, and Boeing 787 families. Because the only

Boeing 787 – 2.31 L/100 km (102 mpg‑US); Airbus A350 – 2.39 L/100 km (98 mpg‑US). Thus we can assume that the Boeing 787-10 actually ...

In addition to the improved fuel burn requirements, the 787 propulsion system also had to meet more stringent noise and emissions requirements. Finally, in order to maximize the capital value of the airplane, Boeing decided that the propulsion systems should be designed for full interchangeability between the two engine types.

gained in terms of reduced fuel burn — the 787 systems architecture accounts for predicted fuel savings of about 3 percent. the 787 also offers operators operational efficiencies due to the advantages of electrical systems compared to pneumatic systems in terms of weight and reduced lifecycle costs. this article explores the 787’s no­bleed

"The most fuel efficient airline was Norwegian Air Shuttle with 40 pax-km/L - 2.5 litres per 100 kilometres (94 mpg -US) per passenger, thanks to its fuel efficient Boeing 787-8, a high 86% passenger load factor and a high density of 1.18 seat

Fuel Capacity Litres, 126,206 Litres (33,340 US gal). 126,372 Litres (36,384 US gal) ; Speeds ; Vmo/Mmo Velocity/Mach Max Operating speed. Mach 0.90 (593 mph, 515 ...

Around 2 tons per hour seems to be a generally accepted average figure. ... The response is being updated here to reflect fuel consumption relating to the 787-10 ...

Jun 17, 2020 · As we see, an Airbus A380 burns twice as much fuel per hour as a Boeing 787-9. A head-to-head comparison between the two aircraft can give airlines millions of dollars in savings just by choosing a 787-9 over the A380 (though an A380 has almost double the number of seats compared to the 787).

Modern jet aircraft have twice the fuel efficiency of the earliest jet airliners. Late 1950s piston airliners like the Lockheed L-1049 Super Constellation and DC-7were 1% to 28% more energy-intensive than 1990s jet airliners which cruise 40 to 80% faster. The early jet airliners were designed at a time when air crew labor costs were higher relative to fuel costs. Despite the high fuel consumption, be…

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner, the airline cost accountant's favorite. Credits: Tomás Del Coro. But how exactly does the fuel consumption ...

Director, 787 Systems The Boeing 787 Dreamliner features a unique systems architecture that offers numerous advantages to operators. The new airplane’s use of electrical systems reduces fuel usage and increases operational efficiency. the primary differentiating factor in the systems architecture of the 787 is its emphasis on

The Boeing 787-8, 787-9 and 787-10 are described in the Boeing 787 Specs table at the bottom of this page which shows the detailed specifications of each of the types. As well as bringing large jet ranges to a medium-sized jet, the Boeing 787 also matches the speeds of larger jets with a cruise of Mach 0.85.

Comparison of transatlantic market capacity provided by each ... the Boeing 787-9 for Virgin Atlantic and Boeing 777-300ER for Aeroflot.

Airbus states a fuel rate consumption of their A380 at less than 3 L/100 km per passenger (78 passenger-miles per US gallon). Newer aircraft like the Boeing 787 ...

A: Boeing designed the 787 to use 20 percent less fuel than comparable aircraft. The Boeing 767-300ER consumes 1,600 gallons of fuel for each hour in flight. With jet fuel currently costing $2.91 a gallon, airlines could save $13,000 during the 14-hour flight between Boston and Tokyo.

Answer: Really there are three things that influence that: Boeing 787 Dreamliner - Wikipedia * The load-out for the particular mission (flight) * The types of engines used and there are two qualified * * General Electric GEnx - Wikipedia * Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 - Wikipedia * The specif...