srch

27.03.2019 · Re: .deb vs Flatpak vs Snap vs AppImage: What to use when? Post by Hoser Rob » Tue Feb 12, 2019 5:19 pm I agree with xenopeek, the repo software from SOftware Manager (I use Synaptic Package Manager usually, try it) is your best choice.

Are Flatpak files just .deb files that come with their own dependencies packaged? As a followup: is it better/worse/same to install flatpak ...

.debs don't receive updates - you have to find and install them manually, whereas Flatpaks and Snaps are automatically updated if and when the ...

06.09.2019 · .deb files are only for Debian and derivatives; Fedora instead uses the rpm packaging format in line with Red Hat and SUSE derivatives. There are technically ways of converting between them automatically (such as alien), but that can unsurprisingly result in package files that are a bit of a mess.

Nuvola Apps are provided as Flatpak packages that can be installed on every ... You don't need to worry whether there is a DEB/RPM/PKGBUILD or another ...

Deb files are installation files packaged only for Debian based Linux distributions (ex : Ubuntu, mint , zorin, Debian itself). Flatpaks are similar package managment but it will run in all the distribution (eg : opensuse, fedora, Ubuntu, Manjaro), it's not bound by any distribution. There are two more similar techs like flatpaks. 1. Snap 2. appimage.

The two most popular package formats are the DEB and RPM. Debian and derivative distros like Ubuntu use Debs, while Fedora, Red Hat, and ...

Flatpak VS Code may have some problems debugging certain software, like connecting to the browser or using a SDK like .NET Core. But you can code and run things just fine. The .Deb version has none of these issues though 2 level 1 · 2 yr. ago That's a broad topic. I personally install just about everything.

When comparing DPKG (Debian Package Manager) vs Flatpak, the Slant community recommends DPKG (Debian Package Manager) for most people.

Flatpak VS Code may have some problems debugging certain software, like connecting to the browser or using a SDK like .NET Core. But you can code and run things just fine. The .Deb version has none of these issues though. 2. level 1.

One thing to consider is that a Flatpak binary comes with ALL its dependencies bundled. So, for example the Emacs flatpak binary sits at ~1GB download, while its deb version sits ~21MB. 2 level 2 concisehacker Op · 2 yr. ago So basically flatpak sounds like the better choice to install... 1 Continue this thread level 1 [deleted]

flatpak_1.6.3-1_amd64.deb: Application deployment framework for desktop apps: Ubuntu Universe arm64 Official: flatpak_1.6.3-1_arm64.deb: Application deployment framework for desktop apps: Ubuntu Updates Universe amd64 Official: flatpak_1.6.5-0ubuntu0.4_amd64.deb: Application deployment framework for desktop apps: Ubuntu Updates Universe arm64 ...

The days of chasing multiple Linux distributions are over. Standalone apps for Linux are here!

I like the containerization of Flatpaks, but for certain applications deb is the way to go and Steam is one of those apps. I found too much instability with the Flatpak version and with the deb install, the minor system integration (e.g. status bar) worked perfectly, whereas the Flatpak install did not. 4. level 1. · 2 yr. ago.

So basically flatpak sounds like the better choice to install... System - deb (quality& stability), user space apps - flatpak (latest features&bugfixes). flatpaks get updated faster than repo apps on Ubuntu-based distros. I use .debs from the repos, and flatpaks if they aren't otherwise available.

Are Flatpak files just .deb files that come with their own dependencies packaged? As a followup: is it better/worse/same to install flatpak vs deb …

Deb-pakker fra Pops repo er definitivt tryggere enn å laste ned ppas fra tilfeldige nettsteder.

I want to download LibreOffice latest version Should I download the .deb file or the Flatpak?? Also, will the .deb file get updates from the ...

deb basically integrates into your OS and environment, whereas flatpak (or snap) runs as an isolated sandbox. Some people can prefer flatpak due to being isolated and containing all of the dependencies packaged in rather than having them all over your system, but due to being isolated, they might not play very well with other apps if necessary (as far as integrations go).

Feb 12, 2019 · Re: .deb vs Flatpak vs Snap vs AppImage: What to use when? Post by murray » Wed Feb 13, 2019 2:57 am I read somewhere that Flatpaks can use a lot of space because they include everything needed to run the program (eg all libraries, etc).

deb basically integrates into your OS and environment, whereas flatpak (or snap) runs as an isolated sandbox. Some people can prefer flatpak due to being isolated and containing all of the dependencies packaged in rather than having them all over your system, but due to being isolated, they might not play very well with other apps if necessary (as far as integrations go).

18.01.2021 · Flatpak vs Snaps vs AppImage vs Packages - Linux packaging formats compared # ubuntu # linux # archlinux. Originally Published in thekrishna.in on Jun 27, 2020. ... Since the DEB and RPM packages are pre-compiled for your architecture, they're quicker to install.