Not the case for musl or glibc (The linked functions are called from the getline function) glibc. Posts with mentions or reviews of glibc. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-25. Tell HN ...
Performance just isn't a reason to choose between musl/glibc. The difference isn't big enough to significantly matter (in any benchmarks I've seen to date).
musl is great, but currently has a some compatibility issues that should be fixed in time. If you're doing a very specific thing, and musl works for that, then go with musl. However, if you're using your void machine for all sorts of things, then I'd go with glibc. Edit: On any high-end pc, the performance difference between musl and glibc ...
Also note that openrisc has been mostly superceded by risc-v, which afaik glibc and musl both support; don't know about the other libcs. ainar-g on Oct 18, 2019 [–] These are rather old though: musl 1.1.5 uClibc 0.9.33.2 (Buildroot 2015.02) dietlibc 0.32 glibc 2.19. musl is …
Performance comparison, musl, uClibc, dietlibc, glibc ... say about which names are reserved for the implementation versus reserved for the application.
musl's printf is more clean than glibc's, no question, but it does less though. Only because I've wasted time to look at many of them, it doesn't look bad, but ...
Under glibc, the contents of all static storage in a library will be reset to its original state if the library is unloaded and reloaded. Under musl, it will ...
musl is a C standard library intended for operating systems based on the Linux kernel, ... There is partial ABI compatibility with the part of glibc required by ...
16.03.2018 · Glibc is obviously faster. Musl is not meant to be fast. 1 Like. diizzy March 16, 2018, 8:01am #4. This is most likely going to boil down to arch, compiler and application. My personal guess would be that musl is going to be faster on architectures with small cache (mips, arm) in general while x86/amd64 probably benefits from glibc.
musl is more lightweight,neat and well-thoughy with considerably less code comes also much more security, which is the main and probably the only (still surely relevant) musl pro; musl vs glibc performance benchs are often contradictory. musl would perform better only on limited specs/embedded. 7. level 2. steve-ddit.
musl is faster, it is rare but you can still get errors on some programs. personally i use musl for servers and glibc for desktop (able to run 32-bit programs, etc) 3. level 2. Unwashed_villager. · 2y. AFAIK musl is not faster, just not so resource heavy as glibc.
Answer (1 of 3): Performance just isn’t a reason to choose between musl/glibc. The difference isn’t big enough to significantly matter (in any benchmarks I’ve seen to date). In most cases, musl is not slower. Rust users have seen similar. I’ve spent more time working in …