Jeg har søkt etter innlegg som nevner både biblioteket lib_nrf24 og noe av «OSError» «errno 9» eller «Dårlig filbeskrivelse» og kommer med null treff for skjæringspunktet mellom disse to utgavene. Jeg skjønner på lib_nrf24 github-siden det står lib rary er ute av støtte fra mai 2018.
Same issue, python 3.8.0 sanic 19.12.2 gunicorn 20.0.4. Edit: this happens when i run locally on my Mac, but not when running inside a Linux docker, might help you
@leond08 Thanks for the ticket!. In order to understand how it is happening can you provide a little more info? wich version of Gunicorn are you testing; which worker are you using
27.10.2013 · OSError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor in python 3. Ask Question Asked 8 years, 2 months ago. Active 5 months ago. Viewed 32k times 5 I'm a beginning/intermediate level programmer currently trying to write a simple web server in Python 3. However, whenever I run ...
OSError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor after ransonware attack. I was usinng python 3.7 to write a project in Django but my computer was attacked by the .horon malware.I managed to remove the malware but since that I have not been able to run the djang commands in my projects.For exmaple when I type "python manage.py runserver ",it throws the ...
01.12.2020 · IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor. In the above code, del f line will delete the last reference to the file object, Ultimately file.__del__ will be called. The Internal state indicates that the file is still open since f.close() was never called, So here someone tries to close the file, that someone is destructor here.
So, sometimes even 10 executions in a row could work okay. Also, I don't think you added any files to /tmp/t. Try touch a b c in the directory first, then maybe 20 iters of my code to be safe. For some reason I find a lesser rate of errors when there are fewer files in the directory.
07.10.2021 · OSError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor. It means that the file defined in the program is already closed automatically while running the code. There lies no use in defining a separate method to perform the same task again.