Runge-Kutta method - Oklahoma State University–Stillwater
math.okstate.edu › Notes › rungekuttaHere’s the formula for the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method (RK45). w 0 = k 1 = hf(t i;w i) k 2 = hf t i + h 4;w i + k 1 4 k 3 = hf t i + 3h 8;w i + 3 32 k 1 + 9 32 k 2 k 4 = hf t i + 12h 13;w i + 1932 2197 k 1 7200 2197 k 2 + 7296 2197 k 3 k 5 = hf t i +h;w i + 439 216 k 1 8k 2 + 3680 513 k 3 845 4104 k 4 k 6 = hf t i + h 2;w i 8 27 k 1 +2k 2 3544 2565 k 3 + 1859 4104 k 4 11 40 k 5 w i+1 = w i + 25 216 k 1 + 1408 2565 k 3 + 2197 4104 k 4 1 5 k 5 w~ i+1 = w i + 16 135 k 1 + 6656 12825 k
Runge-Kutta Methods - Massachusetts Institute of Technology
web.mit.edu › 10 › WebRunge-Kutta Methods. In the forward Euler method, we used the information on the slope or the derivative of yat the given time step to extrapolate the solution to the next time-step. The LTE for the method is O(h2), resulting in a first order numerical technique. Runge-Kutta methods are a class of methods which judiciously uses the information on the 'slope' at more than one point to extrapolate the solution to the future time step.
Math 128a: Runge-Kutta Methods
math.berkeley.edu › ~andrewshi › 128a_notesHere it is written as a Runge Kutta Method: k 1 = f(t n;w n) k 2 = f t n + h 2;w n + h 2 k 1 w n+1 = w n + hk 2 Here it is as a one-liner: w n+1 = w n + hf t n + h 2;w n + h 2 f(t n;w n) Here is its Butcher Table: 0 0 0 1=2 1=2 0 0 1 This is what’s called the Explicit Midpoint Method (or Midpoint Method with Euler Pre-dictor) Here’s another idea { instead of obtaining w
List of Runge–Kutta methods - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Runge–Kutta_methodsThe backward Euler method is first order. Unconditionally stable and non-oscillatory for linear diffusion problems. The implicit midpoint method is of second order. It is the simplest method in the class of collocation methods known as the Gauss-Legendre methods. It is a symplectic integrator. The Crank–Nicolson methodcorresponds to the implicit trapezoidal rule and is a second-order a…