srch

Van Gend en Loos was in de jaren zestig partij in een arrest van het Europese Hof van Justitie over het karakter en de voorrang van het Europees recht: het zogenoemde Van Gend en Loos-arrest uit 1963 over de werking van het Verdrag van Rome in de diverse landen van de Europese Gemeenschap, de voorloper van de Europese Unie.

Van Gend & Loos -no longer a family business from 1885 onwards- became synonymous for package services. After several reorganisations and take- ...

The case arose from the reclassification of a chemical, by the Benelux countries, into a customs category entailing higher customs charges. Preliminary ...

Case 26/62, Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen (1963) ECR 1 is a European Union Law case concerning the Doctrine of Direct Effect.

The company Van Gend & Loos was established in 1809 when the Antwerp-based carriage driver Jan-Baptist van Gend, married to Maria Loos in 1796, merged his diligence company with the Loos family business. The Van Gend & Loos company gradually extended its network of diligence services to transport passengers, goods and money.

Van Gend en Loos, a postal and transportation company, imported urea formaldehyde from West Germany to the Netherlands. The authorities charged them a tariff on the import. Van Gend en Loos objected, stating that it was a clear violation of Article 12 of the Treaty of Rome (now replaced by Article 30 TFEU), which stated:

L’arrêt Van Gend en Loos rendu en date du 05/02/1963 par la Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes est un arrêt fondateur pour le droit européen en ce sens qu’il a permis l’accélération du projet communautaire.

Case 26/62 Van Gend en Loos by Will Chen Key point This case established that Treaty provisions have direct effect in national law i.e., they can be relied upon by individuals in national courts A provision must be clear and unconditional to have direct effect Facts Dutch customs reclassified a chemical product to a higher rate of import duty

VAN GEND EN LOOS v NEDERLANDSE ADMINISTRATIS DER BELASTINGEN service in Luxembourg at the. Consulate-General of the. Kingdom of the. Netherlands.

ALGEMENE TRANSPORT - EN EXPEDITIE ONDERNEMING VAN GEND & LOOS, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT UTRECHT, REPRESENTED BY H.G . STIBBE AND L.F.D . TER KUILE, BOTH ADVOCATES OF AMSTERDAM, WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE CONSULATE-GENERAL OF THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS AND

17.11.2020 · Van Gend en Loos itself applied to not just the provisions of the treaties, but also to the Commission’s Regulations, as they were automatically and directly applicable in all Member States. It wasn’t long before the CJEU held that treaty provisions and regulations could be enforced against individuals as well (Defrenne).

05.02.2020 · Judgement for the case Van Gend en Loos A Dutch company importing chemicals from Germany were forced to pay a higher tariff than article 12 of the EEC Treaty allowed. They appealed against payment of the tariff, on the basis that …

Nov 17, 2020 · Van Gend en Loos itself applied to not just the provisions of the treaties, but also to the Commission’s Regulations, as they were automatically and directly applicable in all Member States. It wasn’t long before the CJEU held that treaty provisions and regulations could be enforced against individuals as well ( Defrenne ).

Van Gend & Loos was a Dutch distribution company. It was established in 1809, and was purchased by DHL in 2003. N.V. Expeditie Onderneming Van Gend & Loos ...

Feb 05, 2020 · Judgement for the case Van Gend en Loos. A Dutch company importing chemicals from Germany were forced to pay a higher tariff than article 12 of the EEC Treaty allowed. They appealed against payment of the tariff, on the basis that individuals could derive rights from EC treaties. Against the company, Belgium argued that this was a question of ...

Facts. The claimants, van Gend en Loos, imported chemicals from Western Germany to the Netherlands where they were asked to pay import taxes at Dutch customs, the defendants, which they objected to on the grounds it ran contrary to the European Economic Community’s prohibition on inter-State import duties, as per Article 12 of the Treaty of Rome.

Summary: The transport company Van Gend en Loos imported a certain quantity of urea-methanal, which belonged to a specific category in the ...

Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen (1963) was a case that gave Van Gend en Loos a place in the history of European Union law. Takeover. The company was reorganised in 1984. Railway transport of break bulk cargo was abandoned, and the company focussed on transport by truck.

Facts The claimants, van Gend en Loos, imported chemicals from Western Germany to the Netherlands where they were asked to pay import taxes at Dutch customs, the defendants, which they objected to on the grounds it ran contrary to the European Economic Community’s prohibition on inter-State import duties, as per Article 12 of the Treaty of Rome.

NV Algemene Transport- en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration. Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tariefcommissie ...

Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen (1963) Case 26/62 was a landmark case of the European Court of Justice which established that provisions of the Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community were capable of creating legal rights which could be enforced by both natural and legal persons before the courts of the Community's member states. This is now called the principle of direct effect. The case is acknowledged as being one of the m…

The company Van Gend & Loos was established in 1809 when the Antwerp-based carriage driver Jan-Baptist van Gend, married to Maria Loos in 1796, merged his diligence company with the Loos family business. The Van Gend & Loos company gradually extended its network of diligence services to transport passengers, goods and money.

The European Court of Justice found for the claimants, viewing that the European treaties gave rise to rights for legal and natural persons alike. Further, the ...

The Van Gend & Loos judgment is one of the most important judgments in the development of the Community legal order. The European Court of Justice specifies ...

Ingen informasjon er tilgjengelig for denne siden.

Claes, Monica: Van Gend en Loos, de autonomie van de Europese rechtsorde en het leerstuk van de rechtstreekse werking, Ars aequi 2010 p.122-125 (NL) Szpunar, Maciej: Van Gend en Loos from the perspective of new Member States, 50ème anniversaire de l'arrêt Van Gend en Loos : 1963-2013 : actes du colloque, Luxembourg, 13 mai 2013 (Ed.