srch

11.10.2020 · ReFS: We have 2 Standalone hosts running Windows Server 2016 with 8 hyper-v backed-up from Server A to Server B every night (about 2.5Tb) The same vms are also replicated from Server A to Server B every 20mins. Server A has one volume in NTFS format that hold original hyper-vs (production). Server B has a newly created volume in ReFS 64kb ...

Deploying VMs. ReFS vs NTFS. There are many changes that can be brought from ReFS. ReFS, or Resilient File System, is a storage ...

ReFS is commonly used for backup with Veeam. ... the volume where such file resides, whether the volume is formatted with ReFS or NTFS.

Veeam can reuse most of the blocks already saved on the usb disk to synthesize a new full backup. On ntfs, the block needs to be copied. On refs ...

12 votes, 16 comments. So, I have been implementing REFS for pretty much any Veeam Repo's I've deployed for the past year or two.

NTFS is going to require a lot more storage if you plan to archive backups. Not to mention it can’t use the fast clone feature of Veeam so some tasks will take much longer. Past issues with refs aside, Veeam recommends refs on a windows based repository.

While we are talking about ReFS, I would like to deviate a little to the deduplication subject. Microsoft ReFS (or NTFS) depuplication ...

20.02.2020 · ReFS vs NTFS on Hyper-V Guest File Systems. All of the above deals only with Hyper-V’s storage of virtual machines. What about ReFS in guest operating systems? To answer that question, we need to go back to ReFS’s strengths. So far, we’ve only thought about it in terms of Hyper-V. Guests have their own conditions and needs.

In general, for our NAS backup NTFS or ReFS makes no difference. Also, built-in dedupe in Windows is a shared engine between NTFS and ReFS.

NTFS or ReFS? ... You can use both Microsoft filesystems for a Veeam Repository. Both have advantages and disadvantages during different backup situations. ReFS ...

Back up your data with Veeam on a ReFS and monitor it with PRTG. ... The Resilent or Reliable File System (ReFS) was designed to overcome ...

14.01.2019 · I'd been advised by a partner organisation that ReFS is now 'their standard filesystem for Veeam deployments'. So I advised one of my clients do to the same when they were recently building a new Veeam server (50+ TB storage, Windows 2016). Initially we found a noticeable improvement in backup speeds (write operations, fast-clone natively ...

09.09.2016 · 1. With NTFS volume, this results in a small, contained data corruption. 2. With ReFS volume, there's a good chance of the entire volume loss (if lost data is the file system metadata) - and it sounds like they had enough support cases to justify this restriction.

For secondary storage and GFS backups ReFS is better than NTFS (an have not let me down so far): faster merges, GFS backup which uses block ...

22.04.2015 · More information. Best practices for MS deduplicated volumes as backup repository: 1) It is important to format the volume with large NTFS File Record Segment (FRS) (4096 bytes instead of 1024 by default) as you could face NTFS limitation errors in future. You could verify FRS size with the following command:

Veeam Community discussions and solutions for: REFS or NTFS? of Veeam Backup & Replication.