srch

Arch Linux vs Void Linux vs OpenSUSE. After using Kubuntu I want to learn the base linux distros and these were some I found that are not ...

Moved from arch as well, I really like void and the community most of all. I can ask a question here without people getting angry at me because I missed a couple of lines in the wiki! :) Xbps is great and together with flatpac I got everything I need (Just need to fix …

hi im starting to learn building package, coming from arch with aur, does anyone can help me build signal-cli this is the only package im missing in void linux 😅 thank you ... help Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts.

Arch Linux vs Void Linux vs OpenSUSE distro selection After using Kubuntu I want to learn the base linux distros and these were some I found that are …

I used glibc base version of Void and both are tested on the same hardware. EDIT: I tested with "time alacritty -e exit" on both machines. Arch Xmonad took on average 0.085s, Void Xmonad and i3 took on average 0.235s. Both using picom-ibhagwan fork. Void Linux is a general operating system based on the Linux Kernel.

As far as I know, Arch Linux is less minimal compared to Void Linux, and has with systemd. Those 2 points could be critical for many. Void Linux also has different repositories and packaging system, which I think is reasonable to expect to have less packages.

Arch Linux supports only x86_64 in the main project · Void supports i686, x86_64, armv6, armv7 and aarch64 with both musl and glibc under one ...

Void has a repository with -dbg packages containing the debug symbols. Arch only maintains two kernels, mainline and lts. Void maintains kernels in packages with the a version suffix, linuxX.XX. Users can choose which series for how long they want to use. (also great for embedded systems) Arch kernel updates remove the old kernel version

Void is much simpler and much more lightweight, but being usable unlike crux. Arch requires countless unneeded "dependencies". The AUR is like dirty red light district. Systemd is over million lines of code, runit is about 2,000. Arch without Systemd implementations are pretty bad due to it not being officially supported in anyway. 2 level 1

Void supports i686, x86_64, armv6, armv7 and aarch64 with both musl and glibc under one project, one source repository. Arch linux does not allow partial updates. Void linux allows partial updates because the package manager tracks shared libraries and big issues can be avoided by aborting the transaction if a conflict exists

Arch Linux supports only x86_64 in the main project · Void supports i686, x86_64, armv6, armv7 and aarch64 with both musl and glibc under one ...

I recently found VoidLinux and I was thinking to change from Arch to Void. There is better performance on a laptop compared to Arch? I have ...

If you're not as good at figuring things out on your own, Arch will be a better experience due to larger community and better documentation. If ...

unless there's a distro that does something exceedingly well compared to my current distro that makes it worth the effort to back up all my data ...

I'm kinda wanting to install void linux because of musl and runit. ... Life is better than Debian and Arch this way, because in case of ...

One other thing I noticed is that there are some difference in GNOME settings between Arch and Void. Here are two screenshots, first from Arch, second from Void: Archlinux: there is a "login screen" switch at the top of the page. Voidlinux: There is no "login screen" switch. Gnome is v.41 on Archlinux and v.40 on Voidlinux, but I can tell that ...

Arch Linux Vs. Void Linux (Winner Advances to Battle Ubuntu in Round 2) I regret to inform everyone that on January 7th at 5:37 A.M, Kali Linux was indicted on seven charges of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Due to this, Kali will be unable to participate in this year’s Panic! At the Distro. Fortunately, I contacted a colleague ...

Hello, I recently switched to void, I really like this distro and the only thing that was stopping me from trying it out was the longer package manager commands compared to arch(I know it is trivial ) and I didn't have alot of timeso I went with artix(I was more familiar with arch linux at the time).

Arch Linux vs Void Linux vs OpenSUSE distro selection After using Kubuntu I want to learn the base linux distros and these were some I found that are not variants but entirely different from each other.

Void has some traits in common with Arch, like a focus on minimalism and tweakability, but the installation process for Void is objectively much ...

Arch Linux Vs. Void Linux (Winner Advances to Battle Ubuntu in Round 2) I regret to inform everyone that on January 7th at 5:37 A.M, Kali Linux was indicted on seven charges of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Due to this, Kali will be unable to participate in this year’s Panic! At the Distro. Fortunately, I contacted a colleague ...

https://voidlinux.org/packages/ and https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages - just check if the software you need is there.

musl is faster, it is rare but you can still get errors on some programs. personally i use musl for servers and glibc for desktop (able to run 32-bit programs, etc) 3. level 2. Unwashed_villager. · 2y. AFAIK musl is not faster, just not so resource heavy as glibc.

Void is much simpler and much more lightweight, but being usable unlike crux. Arch requires countless unneeded "dependencies". The AUR is like ...

I used glibc base version of Void and both are tested on the same hardware. EDIT: I tested with "time alacritty -e exit" on both machines. Arch Xmonad took on average 0.085s, Void Xmonad and i3 took on average 0.235s. Both using picom-ibhagwan fork. Void Linux is a general operating system based on the Linux Kernel.