srch

1. level 1. eXoRainbow. · 6m. It depends. If there is only one old AUR package and it does not have many votes. Maybe it is complex and big, with many dependencies. Compared to the Flatpak version directly from the creator and up-to-date, well then yes, the Flatpak. But if the AUR is up to date with many good reviews and seemingly not that big ...

no reason to ever use flatpak if a native (aur) version is available 6 level 2 eXoRainbow · 6m If there is a conflict with another package, then a Flatpak could be the rescue. Also Flatpak is sandboxed at little and are a bit safer, if the AUR author and package is brand new and you don't trust him much.

Mar 09, 2021 · Most of the time, there is no need to use Flatpak at all. Most software, especially if free and open source, is available on the AUR. The AUR has the advantage that it is a fully transparent system. You build the package on your machine, so you can know where the software is sourced from and exactly what goes into the package. That’s very safe.

Flatpak vs (pacman + AUR) What is the difference between using flatpak or the default package manager? I have seen people using flatpak to install common software that is already available on the official repos or AUR. I dont see the point of flatpak further than making a multi-distro package manager, ...

When comparing Pacman vs Flatpak, the Slant community recommends Pacman for most people. ... compilation, and installation of packages from the AUR.

AUR would be fantastic as the other ones are usually huge in size. Cheers! ... probably Flatpak or Appimage (not sure which one).

AUR or Flatpak for Spotify and Discord? Hey guys, what's up? I have read some discussions about AUR vs Flatpak here and in some Telegram groups, and i noticed some comments saying that there are some proprietary stuff that goes well with Flatpak because even through AUR it won't be able to use the latest versions of some programs.

When attempting to install a new piece of software, if I see both AUR and flatpack Versions, which version should be best to install?

I always go with AUR rather than Snap or Flatpak. I've only had a few AUR packages mess up in 7 years of using it. Flatpak packages are ...

27.09.2016 · AUR is faster than PPAs but when the compiling is long it isn't. RPMFusion is faster, but it has not as many packages as PPAs and AUR. Flatpack and snaps are the new cross distros package systems. So if AUR can migrate or make a version for flatpack / snap would serve the entire GNU/Linux community (AUR already can be used in RPM distros)

I would always choose AUR first, because it's easier, lighter, and more integrated. Anything that needs plugins doesn't really work as a flatpak ...

It gives us the advantage of installing snap and flatpak packages. Remember often these packages are also available on the AUR. If not yet installed then ...

However, it isn't in the Arch Linux repos by default, so the program's installation isn't simple or straightforward. Install Bauh. The app is in ...

It allows to install third-party Linux applications without having to add repositories or deal with dependencies. Installing Flatpak. First, you will need to ...

09.03.2021 · Most of the time, there is no need to use Flatpak at all. Most software, especially if free and open source, is available on the AUR. The AUR has the advantage that it is a fully transparent system. You build the package on your machine, so you can know where the software is sourced from and exactly what goes into the package. That’s very safe.

AUR vs. Flatpak? twiztedtbone. Howdy. First and foremost, thanks for all the hard work on Bottles. Of all the "interact with WINE" tools I've tried, this is by far the most conceptually and practically appealing to me (vs. Lutris/POL/etc.), and I hope progress continues full steam ahead.

level 1 LastFireTruck · 3y I would always choose AUR first, because it's easier, lighter, and more integrated. Anything that needs plugins doesn't really work as a flatpak. For example, the flatpack version of audacity is useless to me because it doesn't see the audio plugins on my system. On Arch, flatpak is totally unnecessary IMO.

Flatpak vs (pacman + AUR) What is the difference between using flatpak or the default package manager? I have seen people using flatpak to install common software that is already available on the official repos or AUR.

AUR or Flatpak for Spotify and Discord? Hey guys, what's up? I have read some discussions about AUR vs Flatpak here and in some Telegram groups, and i noticed some comments saying that there are some proprietary stuff that goes well with Flatpak because even through AUR it won't be able to use the latest versions of some programs.

4 level 1 · 1y Flatpak VS Code may have some problems debugging certain software ... as an AUR package for Arch Linux / Manjaro, as well as an AppImage that ...

Nov 18, 2020 · Manage AppImages, AUR, Flatpaks and Snaps with Bauh in Linux. Launch bauh from the command line by running this command: $ bauh. At first launch, bauh will retrieve all installed applications and display them in a simple graphical interface as shown in the below screenshot. Manage AppImages, AUR, Flatpaks And Snaps With Bauh.

28.09.2020 · For a long time, I used flatpak packages for e.g. Zoom or Spotify, since Flatpak uses some kind of sandboxing for the filesystem or for networking interfaces (instead of using AUR packages). Now I am looking into snap. Snap also has these sandbox capabilities plus automatic updates. I could install Firefox with pacman (from the official repositories), with Snap or with …

Installing a package via AUR vs. flatpak. To me, the choice for proprietary apps is pretty straightforward. I'd rather a program like Spotify be sand-boxed because I don't know what it's doing under the hood, so I download it from flatpak. But for something like Signal, the choice, to me, is less clear.