Manjaro ? : pop_os - reddit.com
www.reddit.com › r › pop_osManjaro/Arch are good distros, and I enjoyed them. My move to Pop! just represents my jadedness with the kind of extra research and precaution I constantly needed to accomplish one thing. Pop! for me “just works”, has a great out of the box Gnome tiling manager, and has a very kind community.
Pop OS vs Manjaro : FindMeADistro - reddit
www.reddit.com › comments › fbb4t9Manjaro has more DE ISOs, whereas on Pop you have to install them once you have your system set up. On a side note, Pop's Gnome implementation is really good. If i had to chose, i'll stick with Pop, but if you want more chances of making a stubborn game work under Linux, Manjaro, its rolling release and the AUR are your best bet.
Pop OS vs Manjaro? : linux_gaming - reddit.com
www.reddit.com › comments › q3b03xThe other reason I chose Manjaro over pop is pop only officially ships with gnome, whereas Manjaro has spins with other DEs preinstalled. Sure you can install other DEs later on Pop, but I prefer KDE and switching all the GTK/Gnome stuff to KDE/Qt is a huge hassle and can cause breakages, so instead you end up with a system that has gnome and ...
Manjaro or Pop!_OS : FindMeADistro - reddit
www.reddit.com › comments › herls7Manjaro or Pop!_OS. Find Me A Distro. Here's my dilemma. I've used Pop!_OS quite a lot, and feel fairly experienced with it. I really like the fact that it benefits from the Ubuntu support network, and has great software support for the same reason. However, I've recently heard about the AUR on Manjaro, and it sounds fantastic.