Du lette etter:

musl libc glibc

Thought on musl-libc? : linux
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/a00ino/thought_on_musllibc
Musl is slower than glibc in some cases, but as applications are statically linked it does not matter. It also uses less RAM, so in some cases - on embedded systems or when you need to fit more containers in one host, it might be a plus. You can also use glibc on Alpine, it's just not installed by default. 2 Share ReportSave level 2 · 3y
musl - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › M...
musl is a C standard library intended for operating systems based on the Linux kernel, ... "musl libc - Functional differences from glibc". wiki.musl-libc.org.
How to Use - musl libc
www.musl-libc.org › how
How to Use musl In an established application binary ecosystem, the C library is one of the the most difficult components to swap out and replace. Everything depends on the interfaces it provides. musl is designed to be simple and efficient to use whether as the system-wide libc or a tool for making robust static-linked applications.
musl vs glibc - compare differences and reviews? | LibHunt
https://www.libhunt.com/compare-musl-vs-bminor--glibc
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives. Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub.Growth - month over month growth in stars. Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
A tale of two libcs - Drew DeVault
https://drewdevault.com/2020/09/25/A-story-of-two-libcs.html
25.09.2020 · A tale of two libcs. September 25, 2020. on. Drew DeVault's blog. I received a bug report from Debian today, who had fed some garbage into scdoc, and it gave them a SIGSEGV back. Diving into this problem gave me a good opportunity to draw a comparison between musl libc and glibc. Let’s start with the stack trace:
How to actually detect musl libc? - Stack Overflow
https://stackoverflow.com › how-to...
$ /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 GNU C Library (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.27-3ubuntu1) stable release version 2.27.
几种C库比较(musl uClibc dietlibc glibc) - merlindu - 博客园
https://www.cnblogs.com/merlindu/p/6370825.html
100 rader · Bloat comparison musl uClibc dietlibc glibc; Complete .a set: 426k: 500k: 120k: …
Musl vs glibc performance : r/voidlinux - Reddit
https://www.reddit.com › eqouaj
glibc can be faster than musl (glibc has some inline assembly here and there to improve performance), but musl has a (arguably) cleaner codebase ...
About musl - musl libc
https://musl.libc.org › about
musl has history and development roots going back to 2005, but was named and first released as musl in 2011, as an alternative to glibc and uClibc with an ...
Functional differences from glibc - musl libc
https://wiki.musl-libc.org › functio...
Under glibc, the contents of all static storage in a library will be reset to its original state if the library is unloaded and reloaded. Under musl, it will ...
Musl vs glibc performance : voidlinux - reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/voidlinux/comments/eqouaj/musl_vs_glibc...
musl is faster, it is rare but you can still get errors on some programs. personally i use musl for servers and glibc for desktop (able to run 32-bit programs, etc) 3. level 2. Unwashed_villager. · 2y. AFAIK musl is not faster, just not so resource heavy as glibc.
musl libc - FAQ
wiki.musl-libc.org › faq
Jul 25, 2012 · So including it in musl would not help anything at this time. If glibc bug 15838 is fixed by adding an fts64 interface in glibc, we could consider supporting it with a matching ABI in musl, but it seems more likely that glibc will just deprecate this interface. Q: Do I need to define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE to get 64bit off_t?
The libc situation is pretty unfortunate. You can go with glibc ...
https://news.ycombinator.com › item
glibc is burdened by tremendous technical debt, much of it blameless. And the project doesn't see the investment and attention it should. musl by contrast is a ...
Comparison of C/POSIX standard library implementations for ...
http://www.etalabs.net › compare_l...
Bloat comparison, musl, uClibc, dietlibc, glibc. Complete .a set, 426k, 500k, 120k, 2.0M †. Complete .so set, 527k, 560k, 185k, 7.9M †.
c - How to actually detect musl libc? - Stack Overflow
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58177815
So this procedure should work to create a musl libc macro (it will have false positives if another libc implementation has the same behavior or someone without a libc includes a stub features.h for some reason; but Glibc, uClibc, and bionic all define __USE_GNU in features.h or another header included by features.h when _GNU_SOURCE is defined)
musl libc
musl.libc.org
musl libc. musl is an implementation of the C standard library built on top of the Linux system call API, including interfaces defined in the base language standard, POSIX, and widely agreed-upon extensions. musl is lightweight, fast, simple, free, and strives to be correct in the sense of standards-conformance and safety. New to musl libc?
Choosing System C library
https://events.static.linuxfound.org › files › libc-talk
GNU C library (glibc). • uClibc. • eglibc. – Now merged into glibc. • Dietlibc. • Klibc. • Musl. • bionic ... I have a baremetal application what libc.
musl libc
https://musl.libc.org
musl libc musl libc muslis an implementation of the C standard library built on top of the Linux system call API, including interfaces defined in the base language standard, POSIX, and widely agreed-upon extensions. muslis lightweight, fast, simple, free, and strives to be correctin the sense of standards-conformance and safety. New to musl libc?
Compare glibc vs musl libc | DiscoverSdk
http://www.discoversdk.com › glib...
compare products glibc vs musl libc on www.discoversdk.com: Compare products. ... musl provides consistent quality and implementation behavior from tiny ...
Musl vs glibc performance : voidlinux
www.reddit.com › eqouaj › musl_vs_glibc_performance
musl is faster, it is rare but you can still get errors on some programs. personally i use musl for servers and glibc for desktop (able to run 32-bit programs, etc) 3. level 2. Unwashed_villager. · 2y. AFAIK musl is not faster, just not so resource heavy as glibc.
musl libc - Alternatives
wiki.musl-libc.org › alternatives
Provides an extra-compatible implementation of libintl for musl, or a no-op, along with several no-op gettext utilities, and a complete msgfmt implementation. gettext-stub - Provides a stub replacement for libintl. libdrpc - Port of RPC based on Android’s libdrpc. Replaces parts of older glibc RPC functionality and/or libtirpc.
Comparison of C/POSIX standard library implementations for ...
https://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html
musl 1.1.5 uClibc 0.9.33.2 (Buildroot 2015.02) dietlibc 0.32 glibc 2.19 Note that previous versions of this comparison included eglibc rather than glibc, mainly since Debian-based distributions were using the eglibc fork during the time in which glibc was essentially unmaintained.
uclibc,eglibc,glibc,Musl-libc之间的区别和联系 « 老沙的博客
www.kumouse.com/?p=1051
4. Musl-libc C语言标准库Musl-libc项目发布了1.0版。Musl是一个轻量级的C标准库,设计作为GNU C library (glibc)、 uClibc或Android Bionic的替代用于嵌入式操作系统和移动设备。