srch

VOID LINUX: The web pages I used are here first. ... Void Linux Pt-1 Install Both Glibc & Musl In V-Box Down ...

Its primary goal is to run glibc programs in musl-libc Void Linux environments (or vice-versa, but who needs that?). It creates a new private mount namespace, ...

01.07.2018 · RAM use is the same with Void-glibc, but speed of booting up and running seemed as an empirical improvement, while Void is pretty fast and light with either musl or glibc. The size of the installed and configured system seemed much smaller than Void-glibc.

honestly not that much since adopting a GNU-ism or Glibc-ism will in most case result in errors at compile-time. ktta on March 25, 2018 ...

Hello, everyone. I'm considering to try this distro for testing purposes on several servers. I do program using mostly C and don't have much experience using musl, but I know the technical differences with glibc (wich I use for traditional reasons) As said, the installation has testing purposes, so, I would like to get some advice and thoughts ...

Hello, everyone. I'm considering to try this distro for testing purposes on several servers. I do program using mostly C and don't have much experience using musl, but I know the technical differences with glibc (wich I use for traditional reasons) As said, the installation has testing purposes, so, I would like to get some advice and thoughts ...

musl is great, but currently has a some compatibility issues that should be fixed in time. If you're doing a very specific thing, and musl works for that, then go with musl. However, if you're using your void machine for all sorts of things, then I'd go with glibc. Edit: On any high-end pc, the performance difference between musl and glibc ...

musl is great, but currently has a some compatibility issues that should be fixed in time. If you're doing a very specific thing, and musl works for that, then go with musl. However, if you're using your void machine for all sorts of things, then I'd go with glibc.

Not a problem. RAM use is the same with Void-glibc, but speed of booting up and running seemed as an empirical improvement, while Void is pretty ...

musl. musl is a libc implementation which strives to be lightweight, fast, simple, and correct. Void officially supports musl by using it in its codebase for all target platforms (although binary packages are not available for i686). Additionally, all compatible packages in our official repositories are available with musl-linked binaries in ...

As a dangerous generalization, musl is usually lighter on resources, but glibc is faster. If using ARM or very limited hardware, musl may in ...

glibc can be faster than musl (glibc has some inline assembly here and there to improve performance), but musl has a (arguably) cleaner codebase. I think it also has less extensions than glibc. 4 level 1 bgkillas_arch · 2y http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html glibc is pretty bloated 3 level 1 Ethragur · 2y

Void officially supports musl by using it in its codebase for all target platforms (although binary packages are not available for i686). Additionally, all compatible packages in our official repositories are available with musl-linked binaries in addition to their glibc counterparts.

Jul 01, 2018 · RAM use is the same with Void-glibc, but speed of booting up and running seemed as an empirical improvement, while Void is pretty fast and light with either musl or glibc. The size of the installed and configured system seemed much smaller than Void-glibc. We managed to make an .img out of it, transferred the image to disk, and made a hard ...

Additionally, all compatible packages in our official repositories are available with musl-linked binaries in addition to their glibc counterparts. Currently, ...

To use mount namespaces, one needs root privileges. It's possible to use user namespaces instead, but they break setuid binaries (or maybe I ...

Some Linux distributions that can use musl as the standard C library include Alpine Linux, Dragora 3, Gentoo Linux, OpenWrt, Sabotage, Morpheus Linux and Void ...

Musl vs glibc performance I'm running musl on a cheap laptop with mid-range phone specs, and it seems to be a lot faster than Arch with XFCE ( whch i also use with Void). Could I expect the same from glibc? or is it being 'bloated' a silly meme?

glibc does not deadlock under recursive exit, but it's unclear whether such usage just “happens to work” or whether it's supported. Dynamic linker. Lazy ...