musl is more lightweight,neat and well-thoughy with considerably less code comes also much more security, which is the main and probably the only (still surely relevant) musl pro; musl vs glibc performance benchs are often contradictory. musl would perform better only on limited specs/embedded. 7 level 2 steve-ddit Op · 3y
Emerson Gomes. Cyber Security Engineer na Gemalto (now… Published Jul 3, 2020 ... musl performing about 15x slower than glibc! The first reaction is: "Ok, ...
Performance just isn't a reason to choose between musl/glibc. The difference isn't big enough to significantly matter (in any benchmarks I've seen to date).
Not the case for musl or glibc (The linked functions are called from the getline function) glibc. Posts with mentions or reviews of glibc. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-25. Tell HN ...
As a dangerous generalization, musl is usually lighter on resources, but glibc is faster. If using ARM or very limited hardware, musl may in fact be faster, but with more available hardware resources, glibc usually wins, often by using non-standard optimizations (cheating). 7 level 1 choh4zzz · 4m About musl Security too: 1.
Musl vs GLibc Glibc (GNU libc) Jenis libc ini khusus untuk arsitektur x64_86 dan i686. Glibc merupakan pustaka C yang hampir digunakan oleh semua perangkat lunak. Glibc memiliki kompatibilitas yang jauh lebih banyak dan memiliki dukungan multilib sehingga dapat menjalankan aplikasi 32bit.
Sometimes software is (ideally) just done (except for security issues). I use a lot of software that has no significant changes since decades. Regarding a libc- ...
25.12.2019 · glibc is faster than musl and maybe more compatible with every application / software However musl is much smaller in size and is written with security conscious mind. When vulnerability expose the C library it expose the entire system too... I have glibc on my hard drive where Gentoo desktop profile with steam and skype, Google chrome kde...
"The Linux kernel imposes no fixed limit, but the glibc implementation makes fd_set a fixed-size type, with FD_SETSIZE defined as 1024" Everyone using select, with very few exceptions, is using glibc. That limitation does appear to exist in glibc if you look at the source code.
Dec 25, 2019 · glibc is faster than musl and maybe more compatible with every application / software However musl is much smaller in size and is written with security conscious mind. When vulnerability expose the C library it expose the entire system too...
Security/hardening comparison, musl, uClibc, dietlibc, glibc ... about which names are reserved for the implementation versus reserved for the application.
Also note that openrisc has been mostly superceded by risc-v, which afaik glibc and musl both support; don't know about the other libcs. ainar-g on Oct 18, 2019 [–] These are rather old though: musl 1.1.5 uClibc 0.9.33.2 (Buildroot 2015.02) dietlibc 0.32 glibc 2.19. musl is …
Features. musl provides consistent quality and implementation behavior from tiny embedded systems to full-fledged servers. Designed from the ground up for static linking, musl carefully avoids pulling in large amounts of code or data that the application will not use. Dynamic linking is also efficient; by integrating the entire standard library ...
musl is more lightweight,neat and well-thoughy with considerably less code comes also much more security, which is the main and probably the only (still surely relevant) musl pro; musl vs glibc performance benchs are often contradictory. musl would perform better only on limited specs/embedded. 7.
Under glibc, the contents of all static storage in a library will be reset to its original state if the library is unloaded and reloaded. Under musl, it will ...
Answer (1 of 3): Performance just isn’t a reason to choose between musl/glibc. The difference isn’t big enough to significantly matter (in any benchmarks I’ve seen to date). In most cases, musl is not slower. Rust users have seen similar. I’ve spent more time working in …