Runge–Kutta methods - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runge–Kutta_methodsAll Runge–Kutta methods mentioned up to now are explicit methods. Explicit Runge–Kutta methods are generally unsuitable for the solution of stiff equations because their region of absolute stability is small; in particular, it is bounded. This issue is especially important in the solution of partial differential equations. The instability of explicit Runge–Kutta methods motivates the development of implicit methods…
Runge-Kutta method
math.okstate.edu › Notes › rungekuttaHere’s the formula for the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg method (RK45). w 0 = k 1 = hf(t i;w i) k 2 = hf t i + h 4;w i + k 1 4 k 3 = hf t i + 3h 8;w i + 3 32 k 1 + 9 32 k 2 k 4 = hf t i + 12h 13;w i + 1932 2197 k 1 7200 2197 k 2 + 7296 2197 k 3 k 5 = hf t i +h;w i + 439 216 k 1 8k 2 + 3680 513 k 3 845 4104 k 4 k 6 = hf t i + h 2;w i 8 27 k 1 +2k 2 ...
Math 128a: Runge-Kutta Methods
math.berkeley.edu › ~andrewshi › 128a_notes1.2 Examples of Runge-Kutta Methods 1.2.1 Explicit Euler and Implicit Euler Recall Euler’s method: w n+1 = w n + hf(t n;w n). The idea we discussed previously with the direction elds in understanding Euler’s method was that we just take f(t n;w n) { the slope at the left endpoint { and march forward using that. So rewriting this as a Runge ...