srch

"explanation" : "the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists…" – a reason for the decision (line ...

... why the replica shard remains unassigned: “the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists”.

08.08.2018 · the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists 即分片不能分配到已经存在分片副本的同一节点 如何解决呢？

Example

Aug 08, 2018 · the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists 即分片不能分配到已经存在分片副本的同一节点 如何解决呢？

Aug 04, 2020 · the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists as it doesn't make sense to assign the replicas(R) on the same node where primary shard(P) of a index is present, as replicas are used to provide the high-availability and fault-tolerance and always assigned to the node where replica's primary shard is ...

Note: The following response may occur if a valid copy of this shard already exists on the master: shard cannot be allocated on same node ...

... replica shards on the Elasticsearch cluster are not allocated to a node. ... be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists ...

... shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists [[av_index][2], node[SaAmCeedRJCNPYkwpzQxog], ...

"explanation" : "the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists [[logstash-2020.04.14][0]; "explanation" : "the ...

06.09.2018 · "explanation" : "the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists" 在这种情况下，API清楚地解释了副本分片保持未分配的原因：“分片无法分配到已存在分片副本的同一节点”。

10.05.2021 · I setup an ES 6.8.6 cluster with 4 nodes: 2 master/data, 1 master, 1 data. 2 nodes are in same network and the other two in a different network (connectivity is working between all nodes). I generate

NO, NAME, "the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists [%s]", assignedShard.

Shard allocation is performed by Elasticsearch and it happens ... cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already ...

08.01.2019 · In this case, the API clearly explains why the replica shard remains unassigned: “the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists”. To view more details about this particular issue and how to resolve it, skip ahead to a …

There are several reasons why your Elasticsearch cluster could indicate a yellow status. 1. You only have 1 node. (Or number of replicas >= number of nodes ) Elasticsearch will never assign a replica to the same node as the primary shard, so if you only have one node it is perfectly normal and expected for your cluster to indicate yellow.

Overview. A red status indicates that one or more indices do not have allocated primary shards.. The causes may be similar to those described in Status Yellow, but certainly indicate that something is not right with the cluster.. What it means. A red status indicates that not only has the primary shard been lost, but also that a replica has not been promoted to primary in its place.

2 replicas on two nodes cluster is impossible. You need a third node for all the replicas to be assigned. Or, decrease the number of replicas:

... why the replica shard remains unassigned: “the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists”.

18.05.2016 · I have an ES cluster of 2 nodes. As I restarted nodes the cluster status is yellow as some of the shards are unassigned. I've tried to google and the common solution is to reroute unassigned shards.

May 18, 2020 · The shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exist Elasticsearch Dear, I have a strange probleme with elasticsearch (v6.8.8) on ubuntu-server I have several indexes on one unique node.

18.05.2020 · The shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exist Elasticsearch Dear, I have a strange probleme with elasticsearch (v6.8.8) on ubuntu-server I have several indexes on one unique node.

30.10.2020 · "decider" : "same_shard" – which decider gave the no decision for the node (line 27); "explanation" : "the shard cannot be allocated to the same node on which a copy of the shard already exists…" – a reason for the decision (line 29). With this set of information, fixing the unassigned shard problem should be a lot easier. More on ...