srch

Though Manjaro and arch can be considered same, it is not 100% true. It's a customized arch based distro with controlled package release cycle. Good thing about Manjaro is the community. It's much more noob friendly. If you are looking for docs or wiki, nothing could beat the arch wiki. 4 level 1 JavaCafe01 · 2y

Arch vs Artix (vs Manjaro) So I am currently using Manjaro+i3gaps and am thinking about switching (out of pure boredom) to either Artix or Arch with either sway, dwm or i3gaps. Therefore I have some questions regarding Arch and Artix:

The only difference is ease of install, Arch is rtfm, you do it all by yourself, installing DE, drivers, etc.; While on Manjaro in other hand, it's pretty much ready to go 28 level 2 thejoe · 1y And then they forget to keep their SSL certs up to date and advise you to change your computer's time to get around it. 15 Continue this thread level 2

16 votes, 21 comments. I have no problem install arch Linux but I heard that manjaro are more convenient to manage kernel and driver, ...

Manjaro is better because it has one of the best package managers in all of linux. The packages in Manjaro repo are about 2 weeks or so behind ...

What is the difference/advantage of using manjaro vs. Arch? I understand that manjaro is a derivative of Arch, so why would anyone rather use …

As someone who has (and still uses) both distros, I feel that while Manjaro provides a fantastic install experience, it is a completely different beast from vanilla Arch. EndeavourOS is just an easy to install Arch: it doesn't deviate from vanilla much, if at all, and has the same Calamares installer experience. 2 Share ReportSave level 2

Manjaro is a GNU/Linux distribution based on Arch. A rolling release ... If you need more kernels you can install them from the aur or just ...

Manjaro is a seperste distro (or at least trys to) from Arch. They do not use the Arch repos but their own, an incident that is strictly unadvised by the Arch wiki (which is one of the reasons it has a bad reputation for stability issues). EndeavourOS and Arco are just install scripts that install a near vanilla version of Arch Linux.

Kallestofeles. · 2y. Even though Manjaro uses Arch very, very deep in its core, it is heavily modified and is more of an "arch-like" by now. Sure, you get to tinker around but you get that with almost every linux distro.

Though Manjaro and arch can be considered same, it is not 100% true. It's a customized arch based distro with controlled package release cycle.

Arch vs Manjaro. Okay yeah this may look like I'm not new but I am. I've been using Linux for about a month and I started with Manjaro.

Are there any other downsides or plus sides to Manjaro? ... They are not relevant the Arch subreddit and convincing individuals to pick ...

Both have same amount of software and/or applications technically. Both can use AUR, since both are Arch. But Manjaro has more "bloatware" ...

After an arch install, all you have is a TTY. It's up to you to install a desktop environment such as gnome, kde etc or just a window manager, ...

100 votes, 38 comments. Man, if I wasn't already using Vanilla Arch (installed it in February 2020) I would install Manjaro on my main ...

12.02.2021 · All that aside I am using both, Arch linux and Manjaro and must say that Arch is slightly more stable for me than Manjaro. It’s not HW issues, it’s breakages due to the opinionated defaults that Manjaro put in place for their flagship isos and base skels. If I went the Manjaro Architect route, then I would probably had the stablest system ever.

manjaro uses a 'one size fits all' approach that comes with a lot of things preinstalled that you may never use or even find outright annoying ( ...

ArcoLinux or Manjaro. Hello, Currently running Manjaro KDE and really liking the distro. I've been looking into Arch/Arch based for a while now (originally came from fedora) and I read about ArcoLinux and tried out the plasma edition. Really digging the overall look and design. But i'm also a bit worried on the stability.