srch

Manjaro has many issues which other Linux distros do not have. ... Did you eventually get your gf comfortable with ubuntu or something ...

Ubuntu is almost as good in my experience, just a little less refined. Manjaro is pretty user friendly, considering it's based on arch, but ...

I switched from Ubuntu (Gnome) to Manjaro (Gnome) a few months ago. And all I can say, Manjaro has a way lower base usage on system resources. The memory consumption on idle was about 50% less than on Ubuntu. 1. View Entire Discussion (13 Comments) More posts from the ManjaroLinux community. 394.

Ubuntu vs Manjaro. Hi,. I am currently looking for a daily driver. In the past I have used PopOS, and Vanilla Arch (not for long) in the ...

Manjaro simply meet all my needs and more, it worked out-of-the-box with everything and worked flawlessly (unlike Ubuntu and Elementary) for 3 of my other friends computers. Also I am using it for over a year by now and it never broke down on me, and I …

Ubuntu vs Manjaro. Users who familiar with both stable and rolling system types, can you explain their pros and cons for using as first ...

Fedora vs Manjaro vs Ubuntu. I am currently using Mint as my daily driver. One thing that I don't really like is that everything in it is so old, as it is based on Ubuntu LTS. My use case is gaming and college work, I also value privacy. I like GNOME, but the lack of it not a deal breaker. Ubuntu 21.10 is decently updated, but also reliable.

2. More packages. Proprietary software often target and support Ubuntu first, some will only provide .deb(for Ubuntu and debian) and .rpm(for Fedora and openSUSE) packages or use Ubuntu's PPAs, if they are not already in Manjaro repo, you will need to compile and install them yourself or search for Arch's AUR.

rbmorse. · 2y. For a user new to Linux, especially where you're not using the machine to generate revenue or support a business, there's no practical difference between trying Ubuntu and trying Manjaro. They're both solid distros, and while different in many detail aspects they are both solid, well developed and well supported operating systems.

The biggest difference between the two is that one is Arch based (Manjaro) and the other one is Debian based (Ubuntu). In a day-to-day use, this difference will be mostly noticeable when dealing with package management and, imo, Ubuntu is slightly more beginner friendly in that regard.

I switched from Ubuntu (Gnome) to Manjaro (Gnome) a few months ago. And all I can say, Manjaro has a way lower base usage on system resources. The memory consumption on idle was about 50% less than on Ubuntu. 1. View Entire Discussion (13 Comments) More posts from the ManjaroLinux community. 394.

Ubuntu vs fedora vs manjaro · Ubuntu = based on Debian. Uses apt/dpkg as package manager. · Fedora = The upstream (development but stable) version ...

I'm not actually sure why Manjaro vs regular Arch. Mint does a lot of stuff so there's a difference between it and debian/ubuntu, but Manjaro really doesn't do much. 2. Reply. Share. Report Save Follow. level 1 ... help Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts.

Both Manjaro (Arch) and Kubuntu (Ubuntu -> Debian) are KDE based distros (obviously) Manjaro updates KDE Plasma faster than Kubuntu. Kubuntu provides long term stability with powerful apt. But also some of us have found Manjaro more stable. Font aliasing is better on Kubuntu which could help to stare at alphabets longer with ease.

Manjaro vs Ubuntu? I currently use Ubuntu. I like it quite a bit, but it's a little cluttered from my learning curve ...

Fedora vs Manjaro vs Ubuntu. I am currently using Mint as my daily driver. One thing that I don't really like is that everything in it is so old, as it is based on Ubuntu LTS. My use case is gaming and college work, I also value privacy. I like GNOME, but the lack of it not a deal breaker. Ubuntu 21.10 is decently updated, but also reliable.

Manjaro is lighter and faster than Ubuntu. · Ubuntu have incredibly old packages in their repositories. · AUR is much better than PPA. · Installing ...

Manjaro is based on a rolling release distribution called Arch. The thing about rolling release is getting the updates as soon as they are out, whereas Manjaro holds them back for a week without a good reason. They don't check them, do anything with them but instead hold them back.

Both Manjaro (Arch) and Kubuntu (Ubuntu -> Debian) are KDE based distros (obviously) Manjaro updates KDE Plasma faster than Kubuntu. Kubuntu provides long term stability with powerful apt. But also some of us have found Manjaro more stable. Font aliasing is better on Kubuntu which could help to stare at alphabets longer with ease.

If you do pass on Manjaro and Fedora bc of complexity/bandwidth, then personally I'd consider Mint or Pop over Ubuntu. But just my 2 cents.

The other biggest difference is the package manager, APT+PPA for ubuntu vs pacman+AUR for manjaro. I like pacman and AUR infinity more than apt and ppas. Since I play games and like newer features, and dont mind having to get my hands dirty once in a while, im going with manjaro.

The biggest difference between the two is that one is Arch based (Manjaro) and the other one is Debian based (Ubuntu). In a day-to-day use, this ...

The other biggest difference is the package manager, APT+PPA for ubuntu vs pacman+AUR for manjaro. I like pacman and AUR infinity more than apt and ppas. Since I play games and like newer features, and dont mind having to get my hands dirty …

Asking on the Manjaro subreddit if Manjaro is good isn't going to get ... I don't know why people calling Manjaro "worst", when Ubuntu or ...