srch

Manjaro vs Fedora. Find Me A Distro. I have tinkered with different distros in VMs (Ubuntu, CentOS, Arch and others). I feel comfortable with the terminal and I really enjoyed ricing Arch. However, now I don't think I have the time to set up a minimal distro, so I am considering Manjaro and Fedora. What are some of the pros/cons of using ...

Manjaro has tlp by default, but Fedora doesn't, maybe if you install tlp and configure with tlpui, you will get the same result that manjaro. 8. level 1. JasperSaintJames. · 4m. GNOMie. I also have a Ryzen 7 4750U and also had absolutely horrible battery life and the CPU was running hot even at idle.

Ubuntu vs fedora vs manjaro · Ubuntu = based on Debian. Uses apt/dpkg as package manager. · Fedora = The upstream (development but stable) version ...

Manjaro vs Fedora. Find Me A Distro. I have tinkered with different distros in VMs (Ubuntu, CentOS, Arch and others). I feel comfortable with the terminal and I really enjoyed ricing Arch. However, now I don't think I have the time to set up a minimal distro, so I am considering Manjaro and Fedora. What are some of the pros/cons of using ...

Fedora vs Manjaro vs LMDE. Close. 19. Posted by 2 years ago. Archived. Fedora vs Manjaro vs LMDE ...

Manjaro is good since it's based on arch and there's the aur and stuff. But fedora is really nice too. DE is not an issue since both have ...

Manjaro has the AUR for packages not in the official repo's but the aur uses the latest packages from Arch and manjaro's packages are a few ...

Manjaro is good since it's based on arch and there's the aur and stuff. But fedora is really nice too. DE is not an issue since both have the DEs I like. Hardware: CPU: i3 3220 2 Cores 4 Threads 3.2 GHz. RAM: 4 GB. GPU: AMD Radeon R5 230 1GB. I don't need WiFi since it's a PC and drivers are not an issue since I have an AMD card and of course ...

Manjaro has the AUR for packages not in the official repo's but the aur uses the latest packages from Arch and manjaro's packages are a few weeks behind the Arch ones, hence it can break. Fedora with has pretty most packages that you need and otherwise there's flatpack and the RPM Fusion repos. 6. level 2. Hollowpoint38.

Both seem like good options but the main difference is: Manjaro you get AUR and can install anything with 'yay -S $name' and installing things ...

Manjaro is an arch-based Linux operating system that offers great features and tools for beginners. Manjaro and Fedora are pretty famous among users, but they get confused while choosing one of these Linux operating systems in their device. Fedora is an open-source platform and is designed as a secured system for general works. The comparison between Manjaro and …

Fedora vs Manjaro vs Ubuntu. I am currently using Mint as my daily driver. One thing that I don't really like is that everything in it is so old, as it is based on Ubuntu LTS. My use case is gaming and college work, I also value privacy. I like GNOME, but the lack of it not a deal breaker. Ubuntu 21.10 is decently updated, but also reliable.

Manjaro vs PopOS! vs Fedora. Heyo, so basically i've been using Manjaro and Arch for close to a year now i think. Unfortunately i got forced into using Windows for some stuff and had to reinstall and reorganize my disk layout. ... help Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts.

Manjaro has the AUR for packages not in the official repo's but the aur uses the latest packages from Arch and manjaro's packages are a few weeks behind the Arch ones, hence it can break. Fedora with has pretty most packages that you need and otherwise there's flatpack and the RPM Fusion repos. 6. level 2. Hollowpoint38.

I've found Fedora to be a lot more stable than Manjaro. Manjaro is great but personally I don't typically recommend it as a primary OS. Just ...

If you do pass on Manjaro and Fedora bc of complexity/bandwidth, then personally I'd consider Mint or Pop over Ubuntu. But just my 2 cents.

With Manjaro being a rolling release I didn't wanted to take a chance of anything going wrong with the laptop on my travels. So thought of moving to Fedora (Gnome 40 etc.) I must say reluctantly as Manjaro was runnnig too well. Anyways, coming to the point, since installing Fedora two issues i have observed that matter to me - a.

Fedora vs Manjaro vs Ubuntu. I am currently using Mint as my daily driver. One thing that I don't really like is that everything in it is so old, as it is based on Ubuntu LTS. My use case is gaming and college work, I also value privacy. I like GNOME, but the lack of it not a deal breaker. Ubuntu 21.10 is decently updated, but also reliable.

Mint will be much better for games. Fedora is quite strict when it comes to non-free software, so getting Steam (or any other games) installed will be more difficult, whereas Mint has Steam in the official repositories, so it's very easy to install. Furthermore, Mint is based on Ubuntu, which is officially supported by Valve, whereas Fedora is not.

Manjaro vs Fedora vs Pop_OS. So a little context: I have been using Mint for the past year but I am bored of it already.

In Manjaro's favor: The cool kids like Arch. Rolling release (could also be a problem) Arch repositories and options are pretty extensive from what I understand. Against: Smaller / less supported than Ubuntu or Fedora. Rolling release might break things. In Fedora's favor: Probably the most widely supported OS other than Ubuntu

Manjaro vs Fedora. I have tinkered with different distros in VMs (Ubuntu, CentOS, Arch and others). I feel comfortable with the terminal and ...

However once I tried to shift to Arch, I couldn't go back to fedora or any debian based distro. Been using the Manjaro Gnome since a month.

Manjaro vs Fedora. Find Me A Distro. Manjaro is good since it's based on arch and there's the aur and stuff. But fedora is really nice too. DE is not an issue since both have the DEs I like.

Fedora is vanilla you may get into trouble with it, but they are easier to tackle also (from personal experience). If you are comfortable with ...